About the Campaign
The Campaign for Patient Access was launched by the American College of Cardiology in December 2009 as a national effort to reverse Medicare physician fee schedule cuts that threatened cardiovascular care. The site provided background on the issue, the ACC's legislative and legal response, resources for patients and practices, a newsroom tracking coverage across the country, and ways for supporters to share their stories and support the campaign.
From the Newsroom
Medicare Meltdown: Access to Health Care in "Critical Condition"
A press release warning that cardiology access was in critical condition due to Medicare payment cuts.
Read more
Cardiology Takes Legal Action Against Medicare
The ACC filed suit against HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius over the 2010 Physician Fee Schedule.
Read more
ACC Statement on Health Care Reform
The ACC used the State of the Union address to highlight the need to reverse the Medicare cuts.
Read more
Medicare Patients and Physicians Join Petition Drive
Patients and physicians in Washington, DC joined a petition drive calling on Congress for Medicare reform.
Read moreOrganising a Town Hall Meeting on Medicare Physician Payment Reform
The Australian healthcare system has long been a source of national pride, built on the principle that quality medical care should not depend on a person's bank balance. Yet beneath the surface of universal access, a quieter crisis has been unfolding in how doctors are paid for the services they provide. When Medicare Benefits Schedule rebates fail to keep pace with the real costs of running a practice, the pressure lands directly on patients, particularly in regional and outer suburban areas where alternative providers are scarce. This is why community conversations matter more than ever.
Town hall meetings have a long history in Australian civic life, from fiery debates about conscription in the 1960s to recent gatherings addressing climate change and housing affordability. They remain one of the few democratic spaces where neighbours, clinicians, and policymakers can sit in the same room and speak frankly. When organised with intention, a town hall on Medicare physician payment reform can cut through the political noise and put real stories at the centre of the conversation.
In Brisbane, Melbourne, and Sydney, medical associations have been sounding warnings for years about the structural squeeze on primary care funding. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners regularly publishes data showing that bulk billing rates have slipped below sixty per cent in many parts of the country. Patients are deferring specialist visits, and cardiologists report seeing people arrive with advanced disease that might have been caught earlier. A well-run town hall can turn those statistics into a shared local concern.
Grasping the Australian Funding Landscape
Australia's Medicare system differs in important ways from its American namesake, a point that often confuses newcomers to health policy debates. While the US Medicare is an age-based federal insurance programme, Australian Medicare is a universal scheme funded through general taxation and the Medicare levy. The mechanism that determines what doctors receive is the Medicare Benefits Schedule, or MBS, which lists a fee for each consultation or service. When the government freezes MBS indexation, as has happened during several recent budget cycles, the gap between the rebate and the actual cost of providing care widens with every passing year.
This funding gap has tangible consequences for cardiac care, where delayed intervention can mean the difference between a manageable condition and a life-threatening emergency. Research examining the economic impact of delayed heart care on the healthcare system demonstrates how postponed treatment cascades into higher hospital admissions and longer recovery periods. Australian cardiologists have echoed these findings, noting that patients in areas with thin specialist coverage often present with worse outcomes.
The Australian Medical Association has consistently argued that indexation must be restored and that the schedule should reflect modern practice costs, including rent, staff wages, and insurance. Independent practitioners, particularly those in Perth and Adelaide's outer suburbs, have closed their doors or stopped bulk billing altogether because the rebate no longer covers overheads. Grasping this backdrop is essential before stepping into a public meeting, because attendees will arrive with strong opinions about who should bear the cost of reform.
Building a Coalition Before the Doors Open
No town hall succeeds in isolation. The strongest events grow from coalitions that include clinicians, patient advocates, local council representatives, and community organisations with established credibility. In Australia, reaching out to state-level bodies such as the AMA, the RACGP, and condition-specific groups like the Heart Foundation can bring both expertise and audience. Each partner can mobilise its membership, lend speakers, and help frame the discussion in language that resonates with everyday Australians.
Local MPs and senators should also be invited early, not as an afterthought. While federal politicians may decline to attend, their state counterparts in health portfolios often welcome the chance to engage with constituents. A phone call to the office of the local member, followed by a formal written invitation sent through the post, signals seriousness. Including the names of all invited dignitaries on promotional materials can also boost attendance, because people like to know their concerns will reach decision-makers.
Patient voices are the heart of any credible healthcare meeting. Encouraging attendees to share their own experiences, whether they are living with a chronic condition, caring for an ageing parent, or struggling to find a bulk billing GP, creates space for authentic storytelling. Some organisers ask willing speakers to prepare two- to three-minute accounts that will be scheduled at the beginning of the evening. This approach prevents the room from drifting into abstract policy talk and reminds everyone why the meeting was called.
| Advocacy Format | Best For | Typical Audience | Key Strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| Town Hall with MPs | Policy accountability | 80–250 residents | Direct constituent pressure |
| Community Forum | Grassroots education | 30–100 attendees | Peer-to-peer learning |
| Clinician Roundtable | Technical depth | 15–40 specialists | Evidence-based detail |
| Online Webinar | Wide reach | 50–500 participants | Accessibility for regional areas |
| Hospital Open Day | Public trust building | 100–500 families | Hands-on engagement |
Choosing the Right Venue, Time, and Format
Practical decisions shape whether people actually turn up. In Sydney, options range from the historic Sydney Town Hall in the CBD to suburban community centres in Parramatta or Hurstville. In Melbourne, the Melbourne Town Hall on Collins Street offers a prestigious address, but smaller venues like the Brunswick Town Hall can feel more approachable for first-time attendees. Regional centres such as Newcastle, Geelong, or Toowoomba often have well-maintained civic halls that are easier to book and more accessible for rural patients.
Timing matters as much as the venue itself. Weekday evenings between 6:30 and 8:00 pm work best for working Australians, while Saturday mornings tend to suit retirees and families with young children. Avoiding school holidays, major sporting fixtures, and federal parliament sitting weeks can boost attendance. For those concerned about accessibility, confirming that the venue has wheelchair access, hearing loop technology, and nearby public transport is essential.
The agenda should balance structure with flexibility. A typical running sheet might include a welcome from a respected local figure, a short presentation of the funding issue, two or three patient stories, a panel of clinicians and policy experts, and at least thirty minutes for open questions. Providing name tags, a printed agenda, and a feedback form helps people feel recognised and gives the organising committee something to share with follow-up letters to elected representatives.
Promoting the Event and Engaging Local Media
Promotion begins weeks before the meeting itself. Posters in GP waiting rooms, pharmacies, and community noticeboards remain surprisingly effective in suburban and regional areas. Partner organisations can include details in their email newsletters, while local newspapers and ABC local radio stations often welcome story pitches about community-driven healthcare discussions. A short media release with a strong human-interest angle, such as a patient who travelled three hours to see a cardiologist, can secure valuable airtime.
Social media extends the reach beyond traditional channels. Facebook event pages remain popular among older demographics, while Instagram and LinkedIn can reach younger professionals and healthcare workers. Paid promotion need not be expensive; even a modest spend targeted by postcode can dramatically boost awareness. Hashtags that reflect local identity, such as referencing local landmarks or suburbs, help the event feel grounded rather than imported.
On the evening itself, having a designated photographer or videographer, with consent from attendees, creates content for follow-up engagement. Quotes from speakers and participants can be shared in the days after the event, along with a summary of key points and next steps. Learning from community advocacy insights elsewhere reminds organisers that consistent follow-up is what turns a single meeting into a sustained campaign.
Sustaining Momentum After the Meeting Closes
A town hall is only as valuable as the actions that follow it. Collecting contact details from attendees who want to stay involved allows organisers to send updates, petitions, and invitations to future events. A summary letter to every MP whose electorate includes attendees, signed by a dozen or more local residents, carries far more weight than a form letter from a national body. Some groups have found success by scheduling a follow-up meeting three months later to track progress on commitments made during the event.
Key Items for a Successful Follow-Up Plan
- Send a thank-you note to all speakers and volunteers within a week
- Publish a public summary of the meeting on your website or social channels
- Write to local MPs with attendance figures and agreed outcomes
- Schedule a check-in meeting within ninety days to maintain pressure
- Collect written testimonials from patients willing to be quoted in future media
Questions Worth Asking Elected Representatives
- What is your position on restoring Medicare Benefits Schedule indexation?
- How will you support cardiology services in rural and regional Australia?
- What steps are you taking to address bulk billing shortages in our electorate?
- Will you meet with local clinicians to discuss practice sustainability?
- How do you plan to reduce out-of-pocket costs for patients with chronic conditions?
The strongest community campaigns treat each town hall as a stepping stone rather than a finish line. When attendees leave feeling heard, equipped with facts, and connected to others who share their concerns, the groundwork is laid for sustained advocacy. Cardiologists and practice managers who participate often report renewed energy for their own lobbying efforts, while patients discover that collective voice can shift even entrenched policy debates.
Australians have a long tradition of pulling together when the systems they rely on come under pressure, from the historic fight for universal healthcare to contemporary battles over aged care funding. A well-organised town hall on Medicare physician payment reform fits squarely within that tradition, offering a space where clinical expertise meets lived experience. By preparing thoroughly, partnering widely, and following through with persistence, ordinary citizens can help shape the future of cardiology and primary care access for generations to come. Start planning today, reach out to a local clinic or community group, and set a date that gives your coalition time to mobilise.
Campaign for Patient Access