Warm-toned photograph of a stethoscope resting on a wooden desk beside medical charts, conveying a serious healthcare setting

A national public affairs campaign launched by the American College of Cardiology in December 2009 to oppose Medicare physician fee schedule cuts affecting cardiology patients and practices.

About the Campaign

The Campaign for Patient Access was launched by the American College of Cardiology in December 2009 as a national effort to reverse Medicare physician fee schedule cuts that threatened cardiovascular care. The site provided background on the issue, the ACC's legislative and legal response, resources for patients and practices, a newsroom tracking coverage across the country, and ways for supporters to share their stories and support the campaign.

From the Newsroom

Capitol building dome against a pale sky, conveying federal policy and legislative action
April 30, 2010

Medicare Meltdown: Access to Health Care in "Critical Condition"

A press release warning that cardiology access was in critical condition due to Medicare payment cuts.

Read more
Gavel on a dark wooden bench in a courtroom setting, suggesting legal proceedings
December 29, 2009

Cardiology Takes Legal Action Against Medicare

The ACC filed suit against HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius over the 2010 Physician Fee Schedule.

Read more
A stack of newspapers with a muted gray and off-white palette, suggesting breaking health policy news
January 12, 2010

ACC Statement on Health Care Reform

The ACC used the State of the Union address to highlight the need to reverse the Medicare cuts.

Read more
A wide shot of a diverse group of healthcare professionals and advocates gathered around a conference table, deep in discussion
April 12, 2010

Medicare Patients and Physicians Join Petition Drive

Patients and physicians in Washington, DC joined a petition drive calling on Congress for Medicare reform.

Read more

How to Submit a Personal Testimonial to the Campaign for Patient Access

A personal testimonial can show how payment policy affects real appointments, treatment decisions and access to cardiovascular care. The Campaign for Patient Access was created to bring patient and physician experiences into the debate over Medicare physician fee schedule reductions, giving policymakers a clearer view of what financial pressure can mean in clinical practice.

For Australians, the campaign’s United States focus is important to understand before submitting a story. Medicare, the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS), state-funded hospitals and private health insurance operate differently from the American system. Even so, an Australian patient or clinician may have a relevant perspective on the value of stable cardiology services, particularly when explaining how workforce shortages, travel distances or rising out-of-pocket costs affect care.

Stage What to prepare Relevant Australian perspective
Confirm eligibility Read the campaign’s current instructions and consent terms Check whether international stories are accepted
Identify the experience Choose one appointment, treatment delay or access problem Include the city, regional area or remote setting if useful
Gather details Note dates, services, costs and practical effects Distinguish Medicare, MBS, private and hospital charges
Draft the story Use a short, factual narrative Explain the effect on daily life and continuity of care
Review privacy Remove unnecessary identifying information Protect Medicare details, clinical records and family privacy
Submit and share Use the official channel and save a copy Obtain consent before sharing the story elsewhere

Understand The Campaign’s Purpose

The campaign focuses on how Medicare payment reductions can affect physicians, practices and patients in the United States. A testimonial is therefore most useful when it connects a policy issue with a specific consequence: fewer appointment slots, reduced access to specialists, difficulty maintaining equipment or a longer wait for diagnosis and follow-up.

The campaign is not an Australian complaints service or a replacement for contacting Services Australia, a state health department, a hospital ombudsman or a medical practice. If your concern involves an Australian bill, referral, treatment decision or safety issue, use the appropriate local pathway as well. Your testimonial can still describe the wider importance of reliable cardiovascular care without presenting the campaign as an Australian regulator.

A strong submission does not need dramatic language. A patient in Melbourne who kept a follow-up appointment because a practice offered an affordable pathway, or a family in regional Queensland that travelled several hours for an echocardiogram, can provide valuable evidence. The most persuasive detail is usually clear and specific rather than emotional or exaggerated.

Check The Official Submission Route

Begin with the campaign’s website and locate the page for patient stories, testimonials, advocacy or contact information. Read the current instructions carefully because campaigns may change their form, eligibility requirements, word limit, privacy notice or preferred file format. Do not send medical records or personal information to an email address unless the campaign expressly requests them through a secure process.

Check whether the form asks for your name, location, patient or physician status, contact details and permission to publish. Some organisations may request a short quote for their website, social media, media statements or legislative material. Others may accept a longer account privately and edit it for public use. Treat consent as a meaningful choice: approval to contact you is different from permission to publish your name, photograph or full story.

If you are submitting from Australia, make the cross-border context plain. State that you are writing from Australia and explain why the issue is relevant to your experience or professional understanding. If the campaign only accepts US-based stories, do not bypass that requirement; instead, consider whether your experience can inform an Australian advocacy body or professional association.

Build A Factual Personal Account

Choose one central experience rather than trying to describe the entire health system. You might focus on a delayed cardiology referral, an interrupted relationship with a specialist, the closure of a local service or the financial pressure that made follow-up care difficult. A single episode gives the reader a beginning, turning point and practical result.

Write down the basic facts before drafting. Include when the event occurred, what service was needed, what happened, who was affected and what changed afterwards. For example, explain that a patient living outside Adelaide needed repeated travel for cardiac monitoring, or that a resident of Western Sydney had to coordinate appointments around work, transport and family responsibilities. Keep claims limited to what you personally know.

Costs deserve careful treatment in an Australian story. Separate a bulk-billed consultation from a partially covered MBS service, a private fee, a hospital charge, travel expenses and lost wages. Patients commonly manage these decisions alongside rent, fuel and pharmacy costs, especially when specialist care requires travel from a regional town to Brisbane, Perth or Sydney. Specific figures are helpful when accurate, but estimates should be labelled as estimates.

Write With Clarity And Human Detail

Open with the situation in one or two sentences. Identify who you are, where you live in broad terms and what cardiovascular service was involved. You do not need to provide a full diagnosis if that information is not necessary to understand the access problem.

Next, describe the practical effect. Did you wait longer for an appointment, postpone a test, travel interstate, reduce work hours or rely on a family member for transport? Mention the result of the disruption without assigning motives you cannot prove. “I had to delay my review for six weeks because the nearest available appointment was several hours away” is stronger than “the system completely failed me.”

Finish by explaining why stable cardiology funding and accessible services matter. A physician can describe staffing, appointment capacity, diagnostic equipment or practice viability. A patient can explain continuity, confidence, recovery and the ability to manage ordinary responsibilities. If you have a positive example of a clinician helping you, include it; recognising good care can make the policy point more credible.

Use plain English and short paragraphs. Avoid medical abbreviations unless you explain them, and do not copy wording from a clinic letter. Read the draft aloud to identify repetition, unclear dates or claims that sound broader than your experience. If another person appears in the story, obtain their permission before naming them.

Protect Privacy And Consent

Remove information that does not serve the story. A full date of birth, Medicare number, address, medical record number, prescription details and specialist’s private contact information should not normally be included. A suburb, state or broad regional description is usually enough to establish context while reducing identification risk.

Consider whether your account could identify a child, older relative, small rural practice or rare medical condition. Use a relationship such as “my father” or “a family member” when naming someone would expose their health information. Ask a parent, guardian or legally authorised representative about consent where the story concerns another person who cannot provide it independently.

Before submitting, review the publication permission in the form or email. Confirm whether the campaign may edit your words, publish them with your name, quote them anonymously or share them with policymakers and news organisations. Save a copy of the final text and any confirmation message. If you later change your mind, contact the campaign promptly, although removal may not be possible after publication or distribution.

The campaign’s audience may include American legislators, journalists and healthcare professionals. Avoid including sensitive Australian identifiers merely to make the story sound official. A careful description of the experience is more useful than an image of a Medicare card, a hospital wristband or a complete invoice.

Submit And Support The Message

Complete every required field accurately and keep your answers within the stated word limit. If the form includes a category, select the option that best matches your experience, such as patient access, physician practice pressure, affordability or continuity of care. Use a working email address if you want the campaign to verify details, but avoid sending extra documents unless requested.

After submitting, watch for an acknowledgement and check your spam folder. The campaign may contact you to clarify dates, request a shorter quotation or ask for permission to use your story in a particular format. You are free to decline a request that expands the original consent you gave.

A personal testimonial can become more effective when paired with informed local advocacy. The campaign’s local advocacy toolkit may help readers understand how to adapt a personal experience for community outreach, conversations with representatives or professional networks. Use only the material that fits your circumstances and distinguish US Medicare policy from Australian Medicare and MBS arrangements.

If you share the testimonial on LinkedIn, Facebook, a practice newsletter or a community group, publish only the version you have approved. Do not reveal another patient’s information, identify a clinician unfairly or suggest that an individual practice caused a funding policy beyond its control. Responsible sharing protects the credibility of your account.

A well-prepared submission gives policymakers something they cannot obtain from a payment schedule alone: the lived effect of access decisions. Review the campaign’s current requirements, write one accurate account, protect private information and submit it through the authorised channel. Your experience can help show why patients and cardiovascular professionals need dependable access to timely, appropriate care.

A close-up of a handwritten letter on paper beside a pen, warm natural light, soft cream and muted gray tones

Share Your Story

Tell us how Medicare cuts affected access to cardiovascular care. Stories could be reviewed and submitted to local news outlets as part of the campaign's outreach.